American Philosophy Collection Vol. 1-Various
This episode appears to contain dynamically inserted ads. Transcript timestamps may be approximate.
On Deck is built to back small businesses like yours. Whether you're buying equipment, expanding your team, or bridging cash flow gaps, On Deck's loans up to $400,000 make it happen fast. Rated A+ by the Better Business Bureau, and earning thousands of five-star trust pilot reviews, On Deck delivers funding you can count on. Apply in minutes at ondeck.com. Depending on certain loan attributes, your business loan may be issued by On Deck or Celtic Bank. On Deck does not lend in North Dakota all loans and amounts subject to lender approval. Of what sort is cognitive experience? By Frederick J. E. Woodbridge. This is a LibraVox recording. All LibraVox recordings are in the public domain. For more information or to volunteer, please visit LibraVox.org. Of what sort is cognitive experience? By Frederick J. E. Woodbridge. Professor Dewey's recent article in this journal, Footnote, The Postulate of Immediate Empiricism. Volume 2, Number 15, Page 393. End Footnote. As definitely contributed to a clearer understanding of what the term "real" means to many advocates of immediate empiricism and pragmatism. The real is simply that, which is experienced and as it is experienced. It would seem that there could be little further misunderstanding on that point. The challenge to the pragmatist to tell what he means by reality appears, thus to have been met successfully. If it were necessary to lend external authority to Professor Dewey's exposition, one might cite the ancient statement of Aristotle that reality is whatever can be the subject of investigation. From such a definition of reality, it is evident that reels may differ from one another in any way in which they are found to differ. And that, consequently, there may be true reels and false reels, if warrant can be found for such a distinction among the things which may be investigated. There is no need of an elaborate proof to show that this definition, in spite of, rather, just because of, its simplicity and obviousness, is the only fruitful definition of reality. The history of thought is an evidence. To the metaphysician, it is a real blessing, for it frees him from the trivial question, whether there is anything real at all. And turns him to the more fruitful and important question, what is the nature of the real, when it is most fittingly and appropriately defined? Now it is just that question which seems to cause confusion and dilemma, and it is here that further clarification is needed. For the natural and obvious answer to the question, when is reality most fittingly and appropriately defined, seems to be this, when it is truly defined? That this answer is the cause of the greater part of current controversies about pragmatism is obvious enough. It seems worthwhile, therefore, to say something about it. And, illicit, possibly, further discussion from Professor Dewey and others. The dilemma in question is apparent. If reality as true is but one sort of reality, or one sort of experience, how can it possibly be affirmed that the nature of reality is most fittingly defined, when we have that sort, when that is reality is experienced as true? The answer occasionally given, that it is thus most fittingly defined because defined, in a way which most usefully meets the needs which raise the demand for definition, seems to many minds to be unsatisfactory. The reasons for dissatisfaction very much,
Transcription truncated.
American Philosophy Collection Vol. 1 by Various.
This episode includes AI-generated content.
This episode includes AI-generated content.